From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Dec  2 20:39:06 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id CD6F6C3BA06; Thu,  2 Dec 2010 20:39:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.53])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D7AC3BA03
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2010 20:39:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 542857881/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/85.210.97.72/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 85.210.97.72
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhINAKOE90xV0mFI/2dsb2JhbACBegOBU4JflkqBB7hDkFuBIYMzcwSKZ4MF
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,289,1288569600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="542857881"
Received: from 85-210-97-72.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [85.210.97.72]) ([85.210.97.72])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2010 19:39:04 +0000
Message-ID: <4CF7F5D8.1050208@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:39:04 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR
References: <4CD83A1B.40101@stfc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4CD83A1B.40101@stfc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

1. Is the above revised schedule acceptable?

Yes.

2. Do you have any comments on N1838? Please give special attention
to the UTIs. For each significant change, please provide text for a new
UTI.

UTI TR2 (page 10). I favour option (2): add an additional character length 
member. Reason: this is the most straightforward way to solve the problem.

Minor comments:

3:16-17. On line 16, add "one of" before "the intrinsic"; on line 17, change 
"or" to "and".

5:21+. Reword NOTE to
"Because the type and type parameters of an assumed-type dummy argument are 
assumed from its effective argument, neither can be used for generic resolution. 
Similarly, the rank of an assumed-rank dummy argument cannot be used for generic 
resolution."

9:30. Add period at line end.

11:3. Change "is equal to (CFI_index_t)-2" by "shall have the value -2".

14:7-8. Replace "Pointer objects" by "A pointer object".

15:34. Add comma after "pointer".

15:44-45. Move the sentence "Since ..." to a note, since it is just explanation.