From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Fri Sep 17 14:08:37 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 8208BC178DA; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:08:37 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 602 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:08:36 CEST
Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.53])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98D1C178D9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:08:36 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Trace: 496742529/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/80.41.204.47/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 80.41.204.47
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqcBAKb0kkxQKcwv/2dsb2JhbAAHlCrQAIVBBI0j
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,381,1280703600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="496742529"
Received: from 80-41-204-47.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([80.41.204.47])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2010 12:58:31 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <20100917110934.5E9C1C178D9@www2.open-std.org>
References: <20100917110934.5E9C1C178D9@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <711B0189-215F-4973-BFD1-9838CB19BF5A@bcs.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4330) SC22 meeting
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:59:38 +0100
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 17 Sep 2010, at 12:09, John Reid wrote:

> 3. Part 3 of the Fortran Standard, Conditional Compilation
>
> The SC22 Secretary will submit a request for withdrawal of Part 3  
> of the
> Fortran Standard, Conditional Compilation.

I don't understand this.  In the SC22 ballot earlier this year, the  
result was: 7 confirm, 1 stabilize, 2 withdraw, 23 abstain.  Canada  
has the standard "referenced in regulations".  Was another vote taken  
at the SC22 meeting?
David