From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Aug 31 05:52:54 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 80EE2C178E1; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:52:54 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from exprod6og111.obsmtp.com (exprod6og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.27])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149C5C178D9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:52:51 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from source ([136.162.34.13]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob111.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKTHx8kdbJaizDMFg75SsC9e/Gt8W/QQ4i@postini.com; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:52:53 PDT
Received: from cf-vpn-192-168-239-58.us.cray.com (cf-vpn-192-168-239-58.us.cray.com [192.168.239.58])
	by stplmr01.us.cray.com (8.14.3/8.13.8/hubv2-LastChangedRevision: 12441) with ESMTP id o7V3qkgs018892;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:52:46 -0500
Message-ID: <4C7C7C96.7000600@cray.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:52:54 -0500
From: Bill Long <longb@cray.com>
Reply-To: longb@cray.com
Organization: Cray Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fortran standards email list for J3 <j3@j3-fortran.org>
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4317) The joint J3/WG5 meeting in the Netherlands,
 2013 - which week of June ?
References: <4C76A33E.50607@moene.org>	<20100827091756.B2517C3BA09@www2.open-std.org> <20100831012332.9A765C178E5@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100831012332.9A765C178E5@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


The meeting date formula I mentioned is used to schedule J3 meetings. 
Since all WG5 meetings are co-scheduled with J3 meetings, I suggested it 
for the WG5 meetings as well.  We can always change the formula for the 
June meeting. For me the first week of June is bad (every year), but the 
week containing the 4th Wednesday is fine.  We can discuss this as a 
general change for J3 meetings at the October meeting.

Cheers,
Bill



TAKATA Masayuki wrote:
> John and all,
> 
> I agree that the dates should be confirmed at the next WG5 meeting.
> 
> On 2010/08/27 17:06, John Reid wrote:
>> Makki, in particular, finds some weeks difficult or impossible.
> 
> My problems are summarized as follows:
> - I have to attend the faculty meeting on the third Wednesday.
> - I might be appointed a member of a certain important committee.  If so,
>    I have to attend the committee meeting on the second Wednesday as well.
> 
> So, for me, "the week after the second Saturday of June" is dangerous in
> 2012 and 2013, and impossible in 2014, 2015 and 2016.
> 
> The current scheme was agreed when I was absent, forced not to attend by
> my National Body because of the swine flu.  So, please allow me express
> my preference now.  "The week containing the fourth (or first) Wednesday
> of June" is OK for me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Makki
> 

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb@cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101


