From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Fri Aug 27 11:17:56 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 8D392C3BA12; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:17:56 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 4237 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:17:55 CEST Received: from mx2.net.stfc.ac.uk (mx2.net.stfc.ac.uk [130.246.135.224]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13F4C3BA09 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:17:52 +0200 (CET DST) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by mx2.net.stfc.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7R86x4j006122; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:07:02 +0100 Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6C8560D5; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:06:59 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C777223.4090907@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:06:59 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090908 Fedora/1.1.18-1.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) The joint J3/WG5 meeting in the Netherlands, 2013 - which week of June ? References: <4C76A33E.50607@moene.org> In-Reply-To: <4C76A33E.50607@moene.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -2.599 : BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 130.246.135.224 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Toon Moene wrote: > L.S., > > Tomorrow the Dutch Programming Languages Committee will meet. At its > March meeting I promised to convey the definite week in June 2013 that > WG5 meets in the Netherlands, so that preparations can be made. > > I was promised that that decision would be made in the 192nd J3 meeting > - however, perusing its minutes, I cannot find anything on meetings > further than 2011. > > Was this discussed ? Was a week chosen ? > > I agree it's not *that* urgent, but I would like to know if I can tell > my colleagues something definite, or that they have to wait a bit on > that decision. Sorry not to reply yesterday - I was out of the office. This is the latest email on this topic that I can find -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4217) WG5 meeting 2013 in the Netherlands. Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:10:10 +0100 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk References: <20100313100403.EA6C0C178DC@www2.open-std.org> <4B9B64F2.1040502@stfc.ac.uk> John Reid wrote: > Toon, >> During that meeting I asked if NEN would be willing to host WG5's 2013 >> meeting, like they did in 2005. >> >> They certainly would want to do that if we can indicate the week of >> the meeting well in advance (that shouldn't be a problem, I think). > > Would it be OK if we decide at the WG5 meeting next year? That would > give you two years. I think so, but I'll ask Ton van Bergeijk explicitly. It was clear from his response that the 2005 meeting would be an excellent template for the 2013 meeting; basically only the hotel list and some other local information has to be updated. ------------------------------- I have also checked the WG5 list to make sure and find nothing. Please try not commit to any particular date today. I would like to ask WG5 members and give them a reasonably long time to respond. Makki, in particular, finds some weeks difficult or impossible. Could we not leave this to the meeting next year, as we agreed in March? Thanks for offering to host the meeting. It is much appreciated and please convey our appreciation to your colleagues. Best wishes, John.