From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Mon Apr  5 04:31:46 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id C84ACC178DC; Mon,  5 Apr 2010 04:31:46 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A28C178DA
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  5 Apr 2010 04:31:42 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from 218-42-159-108.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp ([218.42.159.108] helo=Marucomputer)
	by ns.nag-j.co.jp with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Nyc5v-0002Cd-QE
	for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:31:19 +0900
Message-ID: <79D978B32AC7497A8FB106D7A12AFB56@Marucomputer>
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20100315140121.B6CCFC178E5@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100315140121.B6CCFC178E5@www2.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4219) WG5 ballot on the draft FDIS
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:31:41 +0900
Organization: =?utf-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="utf-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

> This is the letter ballot that WG5 agreed to hold on the draft FDIS for
> Fortran 2008. This has been constructed by the editor in accord with 
> resolution
> LV6 of the recent WG5 meeting (see N1811) with the few very minor additional
> changes that are detailed in N1822.
>
> Please answer the following question "Is N1814 ready for forwarding to SC22
> as the FDIS for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
>
> 1) Yes.
> 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

Proposed change 1:
  Introduction, page xiv, "Programs and procedures:" bullet point,
  after "A null pointer" insert "or unallocated allocatable".
Reason:
  Missing feature from the feature list.
Note:
  I strongly recommend this change.

Proposed change 2:
  10.10.4 "List-directed output", paragraph 13 (page 266),
  after "Except for"
  insert "new records created by explicit formatting within a defined output 
procedure or by"
Reason:
  This paragraph should be identical to the one for namelist formatting at 
10.11.4.3p5; the latter was changed by interp F03/068 which had too narrow a 
scope and the inconsistency was not spotted at that time.

> 3) No, for the following reasons.
> 4) Abstain.
>
> This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org
> to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on April 12th 2010.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.