From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Fri Apr 2 21:39:19 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id D216AC3BA02; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 21:39:19 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 2012 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:39:18 CET DST Received: from mail2.cray.com (mail2.cray.com [136.162.64.100]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20F2C3BA01 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 21:39:18 +0200 (CET DST) Received: from sealmr01.us.cray.com (sealmr01.us.cray.com [172.28.74.60]) by mail2.cray.com (8.13.6/8.13.3/gw-5323) with ESMTP id o32J5h1n017744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cfexcas02.americas.cray.com (cfexcas02.americas.cray.com [172.30.74.223]) by sealmr01.us.cray.com (8.14.3/8.13.8/hubv2-5204) with ESMTP id o32J5gCx003298 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:05:43 -0700 Received: from fortran.us.cray.com (172.31.19.200) by cfexcas02.americas.cray.com (172.30.74.226) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:05:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4BB64008.8090805@cray.com> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:05:44 -0500 From: Bill Long Reply-To: Organization: Cray Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: WG5 letter ballot on N1814 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1821 WG5 letter ballot on N1814 John Reid, 15 March 2010 This is the letter ballot that WG5 agreed to hold on the draft FDIS for Fortran 2008. This has been constructed by the editor in accord with resolution LV6 of the recent WG5 meeting (see N1811) with the few very minor additional changes that are detailed in N1822. Please answer the following question "Is N1814 ready for forwarding to SC22 as the FDIS for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. Vote from Bill Long: Yes, but I recommend the following changes. In Note 8.45 (page 194 in 8.5.6 LOCK and UNLOCK statements) replace the first comment in the example code: ! Lock to manage the work queue with ! Lock on each image to manage its work queue [This suggested change arose when someone familiar with distributed locks (so-called MCS Locks) thought the coarray variable queue_lock represented a single, distributed lock, rather than a separate lock on each image. The proposed replacement wording makes it more clear that LOCK_TYPE does not have some magical global variable property.] This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on April 12th 2010. -- Bill Long longb@cray.com Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101