From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Mar  2 00:37:18 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E3ECCC3BA24; Tue,  2 Mar 2010 00:37:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 372 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:37:18 CET
Received: from snt0-omc3-s5.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc3-s5.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.144])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C140C3BA1E
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  2 Mar 2010 00:37:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SNT111-DS18 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s5.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:31:02 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [71.131.180.173]
X-Originating-Email: [lpmeissner@msn.com]
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS184D9F9CED7E3883D26B27C13C0@phx.gbl>
From: "Loren P Meissner" <lpmeissner@msn.com>
To: <longb@cray.com>,
	"'fortran standards email list for J3'" <j3@j3-fortran.org>
Cc: <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20100301174456.8A65CC178D9@www2.open-std.org>	<20100301181556.45D4FC178D9@www2.open-std.org> <4B8C47B9.8030904@cray.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8C47B9.8030904@cray.com>
Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4198) RE:  43 Fortran compilers
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:30:58 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFKjEo9HlP1qNYlCG4aEVxgVm1twwJ5Ds8vAeg7I6ICG2dn5A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2010 23:31:03.0973 (UTC) FILETIME=[42764D50:01CAB997]
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

There was some Fortran language research going on at Univ of Waterloo (in
Ont, Canada) by 1974.
My copy of papers from JPL/SIGNUM Fortran Preprocessor Workshop (Nov 1974)
[which was largely motivated by Fortran response to the "structured
programming" fad] includes a one-page paper "Designing a portable
preprocessor" by M Malcolm and L Rogers of Waterloo. It mentions "Altran
translator and run-time support software are written in portable Fortran
except for some M6 macro calls . The M6 macro processor is written in
portable Fortran ." - Was this "portable Fortran" the same as "Waterloo
Fortran"?

Loren P Meissner
(Have you ever imagined a world without hypothetical situations?)


-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org] On Behalf
Of Bill Long
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 3:03 PM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Cc: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4198) RE: 43 Fortran compilers



Ian D Chivers wrote:
> I would be interested in knowing what they were.
> 
> I worked at Imperial College from 1978-1986 On CDC kit mainly (6400, 
> 6500, 170, 174) and we had
>   
>   CDC Fortran
>   Minnesota Fortran

Indeed, M77.  I looked at the manual and found that, in 1980, M77 had the
radical extension of A .op. B where op was and, or, xor, ... and A and B
were numeric type variables, with the operations bitwise.  Only 30 years
ago.  Maybe this idea needs a bit more time to mature. :)

Cheers
Bill


> 
> As the main two supported Fortran compilers.
> 
> I also vaguely remember a Waterloo Fortran.
> 
> There was a CDC 1700 and I think that had a Fortran compiler.
> Would that have counted as another compiler?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> ian
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org] On 
> Behalf Of David Muxworthy
> Sent: 01 March 2010 17:47
> To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
> Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4197) 43 Fortran compilers
> 
> One or two people seemed surprised when I said at the WG5 meeting that 
> there were 43 Fortran compilers in the early 1960s.  The figure was 
> taken from Oswald, H. (1964), 'The various Fortrans', Datamation vol 
> 10 (August), pp 25-29.  Oswald was reviewing 16 different Fortran 
> systems.  I think I also said outside the meeting that the first 
> Fortran on a non-IBM machine was in 1961-2.  In fact it was in 1960 on 
> a Philco 2000, but not called Fortran.  The first non-IBM 'Fortran' 
> was on a Univac SS80 in 1961.
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3@j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3@j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb@cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3@j3-fortran.org
http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

