From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Feb 25 14:39:58 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5C2D3C3BA12; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:58 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from oin.rl.ac.uk (oin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.200]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA06EC178E3 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:54 +0100 (CET) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by oin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1PDdivu005101; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:45 GMT Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3BC560E2; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B867DA0.7030603@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:44 +0000 From: John Reid Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090108 Fedora/1.1.14-4.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4193) f95 corrigendum 2 References: <20100224014321.EA339C178E3@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20100224014321.EA339C178E3@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -4.9 : BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Van Snyder wrote: > Does anybody have F95 corrigendum 2 formatted for ISO? > > N1472 is the WG5 draft. I think the ISO-formatted version is SC 22 > n3344, which apparently isn't in the database at isotc.iso.org any > longer. N1472 is good enough re technical content. The changes thereafter were to things like the header and footer. Also the removal of the references to line numbers and interp. numbers. I can send you the version I sent to ISO, which has this extra stuff removed. > N1421 is WG5 draft corrigendum 1. SC 22 n3194 is identified as > corrigendum 1, but it's formatted as ISO wants, not as a WG5 draft. I > assume but don't know for sure that it is the same as N1421. The same goes for this. John.