From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Feb 25 14:39:58 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 5C2D3C3BA12; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from oin.rl.ac.uk (oin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.200])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA06EC178E3
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:54 +0100 (CET)
X-RAL-MFrom: <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by oin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1PDdivu005101;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:45 GMT
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3BC560E2;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:44 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4B867DA0.7030603@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:44 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090108 Fedora/1.1.14-4.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4193) f95 corrigendum 2
References: <20100224014321.EA339C178E3@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100224014321.EA339C178E3@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -4.9 : BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Van Snyder wrote:
> Does anybody have F95 corrigendum 2 formatted for ISO?
> 
> N1472 is the WG5 draft.  I think the ISO-formatted version is SC 22
> n3344, which apparently isn't in the database at isotc.iso.org any
> longer.

N1472 is good enough re technical content. The changes thereafter were to things 
like the header and footer. Also the removal of the references to line numbers 
and interp. numbers. I can send you the version I sent to ISO, which has this 
extra stuff removed.

> N1421 is WG5 draft corrigendum 1.  SC 22 n3194 is identified as
> corrigendum 1, but it's formatted as ISO wants, not as a WG5 draft.  I
> assume but don't know for sure that it is the same as N1421.

The same goes for this.

John.