From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Wed Jan 20 20:59:19 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 49C9DC4EA12; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:59:19 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 621 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:59:18 CET Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.53]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D70C4EA0B for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:59:18 +0100 (CET) X-Trace: 330813347/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.69.163.3/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.69.163.3 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYmAHPtVktPRaMD/2dsb2JhbACCCASEMY8DxWSENgQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,312,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="330813347" Received: from 79-69-163-3.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [79.69.163.3]) ([79.69.163.3]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2010 19:48:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4B575E21.2040903@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:48:49 +0000 From: John Reid Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4140) Result of the FCD ballot on Fortran 2008 References: <20100118153455.D9E76C7712A@www2.open-std.org> <20100120190933.CB302C3BA3A@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20100120190933.CB302C3BA3A@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Toon Moene wrote: > John Reid wrote: > >> WG5, >> >> The result of the DTR ballot on Fortran 2008 is 12-1-6. Details are in >> in N1801. The UK voted "no" and three "yes" votes (USA, Japan, Canada) >> were >> accompanied by comments. > > I take this to mean that the Netherlands didn't vote. I am very sorry > about that, but I am actually a nobody in Standards-land in the > Netherlands (while I was a alternative to Matthijs everything could be > assumed to be valid, but not so anymore). The Netherlands voted "yes" without comments. Best wishes, John.