From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Wed Jan 20 12:12:27 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 760DFC3BA30; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:12:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 1086 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:12:26 CET
Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF485C3BA28
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:12:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:60212)
	by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1NXYCZ-0003KL-Ga (Exim 4.70) for sc22wg5@open-std.org
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:54:19 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1NXYCZ-0004hL-43 (Exim 4.67) for sc22wg5@open-std.org
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:54:19 +0000
Received: from [131.111.10.32] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.2); 20 Jan 2010 10:54:19 +0000
Date: 20 Jan 2010 10:54:19 +0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4138) Result of the FCD ballot on Fortran2008
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.2.1001201054190.15313@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20100120093954.5E941C3BA1E@www2.open-std.org>
References: <20100120093954.5E941C3BA1E@www2.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Jan 20 2010, John Reid wrote:
>
> We have never put zipped directories up as WG5 documents and I did not 
> want to start that now. However, I am willing to do this if it is the 
> wish of WG5.

There's pretty clearly no point in putting THAT one up!  That's three of
us who can't find any more information than in the aggregated one you put
up, so we can reasonably assume that it's not there.


Regards,
Nick.