From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Wed Oct 21 19:15:01 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 011CDC178E4; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:15:00 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 608 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:14:59 CET DST Received: from ironport2.lbl.gov (ironport2.lbl.gov [128.3.41.14]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C76C178E3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:14:59 +0200 (CET DST) X-Ironport-SBRS: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgIALrb3kqAAwU8/2dsb2JhbACBUpohsRwHAQiPNwKCRQcBgWIE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,598,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="103596831" Received: from angilas.lbl.gov (HELO angilas.localnet) ([128.3.5.60]) by ironport2.lbl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Oct 2009 10:04:48 -0700 From: Aleksandar Donev Organization: LBL To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4099) [ukfortran] =?iso-8859-1?q?Standard=09intrinsics=09and?= coarrays Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:04:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20091020111544.C0F5CC178E3@www2.open-std.org> <20091020154252.946EAC178E3@www2.open-std.org> <20091021161933.1B2FCC178E3@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20091021161933.1B2FCC178E3@www2.open-std.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910211004.47949.adonev@lbl.gov> Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Wednesday 21 October 2009, Bill Long wrote: > Taking into account recent messages, here are some suggested changes: Sorry I have been busy and absent in this discussion, but it looked like things were developing in a good direction and a reasonable compromise was found. In particular, "processor dependent" is good with me for the environment and such. I must say the only one that really matters is what the random_number intrinsic (we are a scientific language after all!). Once Nick has a final draft with Bill's suggestions taken into account I will take a closer look and comment. Thanks, Aleks -- Aleksandar Donev, Ph.D. Luis W. Alvarez Postdoctoral Fellow Center for Computational Sciences and Engineering (https://ccse.lbl.gov) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (http://www.lbl.gov) E-mail: adonev@lbl.gov Phone: (510) 486-5782 Fax: (510) 486-6900 Address: MS 50A-1148, LBL, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720 Web: http://cims.nyu.edu/~donev/