From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Sat Sep 12 20:52:12 2009
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 6568DC76BC1; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:52:12 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 1565 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:52:11 CET DST
Received: from mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl (mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl [85.92.140.50])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA95DC178E6
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:52:11 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2227611F03AB;
	Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:26:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl
Received: from mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id jk67ilIryUJi; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:26:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl (unknown [89.18.176.59])
	by mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C27911F03C7;
	Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 82-169-50-14.ip.telfort.nl ([82.169.50.14] helo=PCErik)
	by srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <erik@forcheck.nl>)
	id 1MmXIN-0003XR-Ly; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:59 +0200
From: "Erik Kruyt" <erik@forcheck.nl>
To: "'Reinhold Bader'" <Reinhold.Bader@lrz.de>,
	"'WG5'" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <200909111449.51679.adonev@lbl.gov> <20090911222252.B8033C76BBC@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090911222252.B8033C76BBC@www2.open-std.org>
Subject: RE: (SC22WG5.4083) (j3.2006) keyword procedure
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:57 +0200
Message-ID: <000f01ca33d6$78a72bc0$69f58340$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcozLmWg3QBLEFW9R/6iskrYCNo9CQAp/DWw
Content-Language: nl
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Forcheck has no problems with this either.
Erik

Forcheck b.v.
Torenmolen 23
2317 NV Leiden
Netherlands

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org]
> Namens Reinhold Bader
> Verzonden: zaterdag 12 september 2009 0:22
> Aan: WG5
> Onderwerp: (SC22WG5.4083) (j3.2006) keyword procedure
> 
> Hello,
> 
> NAG's compiler processes this without complaints.
> Since the procedure statement (in this context) requires brackets
> following the keyword,
> I think there should be no problem parsing this.
> 
> Regards
> Reinhold
> 
> Aleksandar Donev schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is this syntax OK now that we made procedure a keyword? Intel's
> compiler
> > cranks out on it but I suspect that is a bug and not something we did
> > in the language...
> >
> > function test() result(procedure)
> >    real, pointer :: procedure
> >    procedure => null()
> > end function
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aleks
> >
> >
> 



