From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Jun 25 20:36:22 2009
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id C10D3C76BC8; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:36:22 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (sentrion2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.106])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915C3C76BBF
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:35:56 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from mprox1.jpl.nasa.gov (mprox1.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.140])
	by mail.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.3.3mp/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id n5PIZswl018101
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:35:55 GMT
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mprox1.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n5PIZriT011322
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:35:53 -0700
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4035)    Late in the day question
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090625084531.7BDA9C4596C@www2.open-std.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0906242048120.2308-100000@mjolnir>
	 <4A430B68.4040008@sun.com> <20090625062728.6AE23C3BB09@www2.open-std.org>
	 <20090625071541.01403C4596C@www2.open-std.org>
	 <20090625084531.7BDA9C4596C@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Yes
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:35:53 -0700
Message-Id: <1245954953.5080.1096.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]
X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 01:45 -0700, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> 
> 
> Michael Metcalf wrote: 
> >   
> > > Robert Corbett wrote:
> > >     
> > > > In any case, the FORALL construct in
> > > > Fortran 95 and FORTRAN 2003 is largely the same as that of HPF 2.0.
> > > >   
> > > >       
> > > HPF copied theirs from Fortran 8X
> > >     
> > 
> > I find no reference to FORALL in either edition of "Fortran 8x Explained".
> > 
> >   
> I'm sure it was in my paper copy of F8X, IIRC (I don't have it here)
> in the "Journal of Development" section.

FORALL was in S8.99 in April of 1986.  I didn't bother to hunt for when
it disappeared.