From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Jun 25 10:45:31 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 524DBC76BBF; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:45:31 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113B3C4596C for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:45:04 +0200 (CET DST) Received: from 218-42-159-108.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp ([218.42.159.108] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ns.nag-j.co.jp with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJkZi-0007P3-6l for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:44:54 +0900 Message-ID: <4A433917.5050305@nag-j.co.jp> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:45:11 +0900 From: Malcolm Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Windows/2008022014) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4034) Late in the day question References: <4A430B68.4040008@sun.com> <20090625062728.6AE23C3BB09@www2.open-std.org> <20090625071541.01403C4596C@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20090625071541.01403C4596C@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050205080609030707040702" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050205080609030707040702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael Metcalf wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Malcolm Cohen" > To: "WG5" > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:27 AM > Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4032) Late in the day question > > > >> Robert Corbett wrote: >> >>> In any case, the FORALL construct in >>> Fortran 95 and FORTRAN 2003 is largely the same as that of HPF 2.0. >>> >>> >> HPF copied theirs from Fortran 8X >> > > I find no reference to FORALL in either edition of "Fortran 8x Explained". > > I'm sure it was in my paper copy of F8X, IIRC (I don't have it here) in the "Journal of Development" section. Cheers, -- .............................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo. --------------050205080609030707040702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Michael Metcalf wrote:

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:27 AM
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4032) Late in the day question

Robert Corbett wrote:

In any case, the FORALL construct in
Fortran 95 and FORTRAN 2003 is largely the same as that of HPF 2.0.

HPF copied theirs from Fortran 8X


I find no reference to FORALL in either edition of "Fortran 8x Explained".

I'm sure it was in my paper copy of F8X, IIRC (I don't have it here) in the "Journal of Development" section.

Cheers,
--
.............................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.

--------------050205080609030707040702--