From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Jun 25 09:15:41 2009
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id D4310C76BBF; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:15:41 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 789 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:15:41 CET DST
Received: from smtp-out01.alice-dsl.net (smtp-out01.alice-dsl.net [88.44.60.11])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFA7C4596C
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:15:17 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from out.alice-dsl.de ([192.168.125.61]) by smtp-out01.alice-dsl.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
	 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:02:06 +0200
Received: from MichaelPC ([85.179.19.175]) by out.alice-dsl.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
	 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:02:06 +0200
Message-ID: <62DAF32594D24D16AE3F11FC34589F6C@MichaelPC>
Reply-To: "Michael Metcalf" <michaelmetcalf@compuserve.com>
From: "Michael Metcalf" <michaelmetcalf@alice.de>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0906242048120.2308-100000@mjolnir><4A430B68.4040008@sun.com> <20090625062728.6AE23C3BB09@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090625062728.6AE23C3BB09@www2.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4032)  Late in the day question
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:02:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2009 07:02:06.0473 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9B29790:01C9F562]
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:27 AM
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4032) Late in the day question


> 
> 
> Robert Corbett wrote:
>>
>> In any case, the FORALL construct in
>> Fortran 95 and FORTRAN 2003 is largely the same as that of HPF 2.0.
>>   
> HPF copied theirs from Fortran 8X

I find no reference to FORALL in either edition of "Fortran 8x Explained".

Regards,

Mike Metcalf