From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Jun 25 08:02:03 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B3E78C4596C; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:02:03 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700E5C3BB09 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:01:37 +0200 (CET DST) Received: from 218-42-159-108.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp ([218.42.159.108] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ns.nag-j.co.jp with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJi1W-0005lk-GE for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:01:26 +0900 Message-ID: <4A4312C7.2020500@nag-j.co.jp> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:01:43 +0900 From: Malcolm Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Windows/2008022014) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4028) (j3.2006) LOCK/UNLOCK question References: <4A38A3BB.9090208@nag-j.co.jp><4A38B917.8080202@llnl.gov> <4A391682.8060208@cray.com> <061720091627.18164.4A39196C000C05A4000046F422230703729B0A02D29B9B0EBF02019C050C079D0B020A08D2050C070B@att.net> <4A3930E3.8070505@cray.com> <061720091851.25112.4A393B4100015BA20000621822228869349B0A02D29B9B0EBF02019C050C079D0B020A08D2050C070B@att.net> <4A397E50.9010406@nag-j.co.jp> <4A3F9897.8010103@llnl.gov> <4A3FA25D.1050507@cray.com> <4A3FF921.9070703@llnl.gov> <20090622221248.1FEF4C178E5@www2.open-std.org> <20090623084602.88A3EC178E5@www2.open-std.org> <20090624020300.8EE77C178E5@www2.open-std.org> <20090625033421.31AAEC3BB09@www2.open-std.org> <20090625041351.94A5AC3BB09@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20090625041351.94A5AC3BB09@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Bill Long wrote: > I certainly never even thought of Nick in the class of "hapless > beginners", nor in the class of "really good programmers". I don't > have enough experience to put him in any level. I'm stunned that > anyone would have come to this conclusion. You message replied to Nick's complaints of difficulty, and followed Van's tale of finding it incredibly difficult to get right. By saying that only some hapless beginners have trouble with these it is difficult to avoid any conclusion but that you wish to express extreme disrespect for their abilities and opinions. > > > What I do object to is Nick's frequent declarations that other > programmers are hopeless and incompetent. I am truly surprised that you read his statements about certain things being extremely difficult - so difficult that even the experts have trouble with them - as being about other programmers' competency at all. > This is what I meant by "imperious condescension", which I thought > would be obvious to everyone. Quite the reverse in fact. Nick can speak for himself, but when he says that some facility is "error-prone even for the experts" there is no doubt in my mind that he is meaning exactly what he has written. I will happily write it myself: "Low level parallel facilities are error-prone even for the experts." > I think it is generally wrong based on my experience, and I think that > is what is out of place on an international mailing list. I think you have seriously misunderstood his message and owe him an apology. Cheers, -- ............................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.