From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Sat Jun 13 17:45:08 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 50FF6C4596B; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:45:08 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.54]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4228C178E5 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:44:43 +0200 (CET DST) X-Trace: 211365356/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.188.167/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.104.188.167 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmIBAJdmM0pYaLyn/2dsb2JhbAAI0S+EDQU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,214,1243810800"; d="scan'208";a="211365356" Received: from 88-104-188-167.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.188.167]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2009 16:44:43 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20090612170056.6A89CC178E5@www2.open-std.org> References: <20090518082831.8FCC8C178E2@www2.open-std.org> <4A31AEF8.4070905@nag-j.co.jp> <061220091522.19234.4A3272A70002646400004B2222230682329B0A02D29B9B0EBF02019C050C079D0B020A08D2050C070B@att.net> <20090612170056.6A89CC178E5@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2D0E8FA6-A4C5-4EE9-AC32-F1ADD22D8069@bcs.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Muxworthy Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4012) (j3.2006) Paper 09-238 Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:45:21 +0100 To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 12 Jun 2009, at 18:00, Aleksandar Donev wrote: > I vote yes! I have no idea what the distinction between J3 and WG5 > list > is. The structure is (best seen if using equal spaced characters): sc22wg5 | | _______________________________________ | | | | | | | | J3 list UK list Japanese list individuals in the rest of the world The UK list is well-used for UK-only discussions. Having a single list would mean people in Australia, India, Russia, etc getting information on J3 hotel reservations that they probably don't need, quite apart from increasing list maintenance work. > It used to be that WG5 was used for the rare WG5 business before > WG5 meetings. Now it is used for technical discussions. Not really. Indexes of all messages since the system started in 1991 are on the web, see http://www.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/2009index.html There has been quite a bit of technical discussion when it concerns people outside J3. > Sorry, it is hard to change "TO" fields on hundreds of messages > from Nick. Come on. The system has been running pretty satisfactorily for 18 years. It is a commonplace that people hit 'send' before they have put their brain in gear but are you really saying it is beyond the wit, or patience, of the current set of Fortran standards people to look at the original 'To:' or 'cc:' field on a message and change the corresponding field on the reply accordingly? Cheers, David