From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Fri Jun 12 10:21:38 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2903EC4596B; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:38 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FFFC178E5 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:12 +0200 (CET DST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:45964) by ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1MF20e-0003ng-LF (Exim 4.70) for sc22wg5@open-std.org (return-path ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:21:12 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1MF20e-0003qF-IS (Exim 4.67) for sc22wg5@open-std.org (return-path ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:21:12 +0100 Received: from [83.67.89.123] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.1); 12 Jun 2009 09:21:12 +0100 Date: 12 Jun 2009 09:21:12 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: "sc22wg5@open-std.org" Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4008) (j3.2006) NOT on Paper 09-238 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090611202717.B07DDC76BCB@www2.open-std.org> References: <20090518082831.8FCC8C178E2@www2.open-std.org> <20090611145654.64B8AC4596B@www2.open-std.org> <20090611180733.9804BC4596B@www2.open-std.org> <20090611182420.3A14AC4596B@www2.open-std.org> <20090611192155.3918DC4596B@www2.open-std.org> <20090611202717.B07DDC76BCB@www2.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Jun 11 2009, Van Snyder wrote: > >> >But that is not a C address, is it? It is a value, for sure. >> >> God alone knows. Despite 1.3.19 in Fortran, there is no well-defined >> meaning of 'address' in C. > >That's why the C standard is a normative reference that is >"indispensable for the application of this part of ISO/IEC 1539" Ah! I didn't know that WG5 felt irreverent enough to include satire in the standard. Regards, Nick Maclaren, University of Cambridge Computing Service, New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England. Email: nmm1@cam.ac.uk Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679