From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Jun 11 16:56:54 2009
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 38FA8C76BB7; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:56:54 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 339 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:56:53 CET DST
Received: from smtp.llnl.gov (nspiron-3.llnl.gov [128.115.41.83])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C2DC4596B
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:56:29 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Attachments: None
Received: from vpna-user-128-15-244-9.llnl.gov (HELO [128.15.244.9]) ([128.15.244.9])
  by smtp.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2009 07:50:48 -0700
Message-ID: <4A3119C8.2080202@llnl.gov>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:50:48 -0700
From: Aleksandar Donev <donev1@llnl.gov>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3994) Paper 09-238
References: <20090518082831.8FCC8C178E2@www2.open-std.org> <20090603133903.6B797C178D9@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090603133903.6B797C178D9@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Repeat on WG5, sorry for rushing the first time:

On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:19, N.M. Maclaren wrote:

> Comments appreciated, especially ones that point out where I have
> completely misunderstood the intent of the standard!
First I have to understand your intention. Can you please explain this
and how it is not covered by "Its value shall be...the C address of an
interoperable data entity"?

"C_F_POINTER is ambiguous about whether a C
pointer with an interoperable
type that has a valid value (either null or not) that does not point to
an object is acceptable."

Aleks