From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Tue Mar 17 10:41:14 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 4CE3FC56CFF; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:41:14 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from gloin.rl.ac.uk (gloin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.201]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756E1C178D6 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:41:00 +0100 (CET) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from cc.cse.rl.ac.uk (cc.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.165]) by gloin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2H9eo80000368; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:50 GMT Received: from cc.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cc.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9E6560BC; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <49BF7022.30302@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:50 +0000 From: John Reid Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090108 Fedora/1.1.14-4.fc10 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3957) Formatting of the next Working Draft References: <20090317030421.8B2F7C178D6@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20090317030421.8B2F7C178D6@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -4.399 : ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 130.246.135.201 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Malcolm Cohen wrote: > Hi WG5, > > If we are really trying to shoot for FCD following the next meeting, we > should make the format of the next working draft as close as possible to > the ISO FCD format so that we are looking at the closest reasonable > approximation to the hopeful FCD and to avoid last-minute typesetting > glitches. > > Obviously, the FCD will have no line numbers (but will have paragraph > numbers) and will be in A4 size. There might be other changes (header > and footer changes for example), such as identifying only by the ISO > reference number not the J3 document number. > > Obviously the paper size setting will (slightly) inconvenience approx > half of the audience whichever is chosen; therefore my intention is to > use A4 (as required by ISO). > > Not having line numbers doesn't really inconvenience me but I know some > people rely on them so my intention here is to retain line numbers this > time around in the hope and expectation that turning them off won't > introduce any glitches. > > Hyperlinks are currently produced in blue colour; if we are going to do > any checking of the indexing and hyperlinking it is useful to have them > visibly different (at least on the screen), so I am tempted to leave > these as blue. However my intention is that this will absolutely be the > LAST TIME they will appear in blue - no way do I want to accidentally > send a multi-coloured document to ISO. > > Any comments welcome. This plan seems fine to me. Thanks for all the hard work you are doing. John.