From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Jan 20 18:11:00 2009
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 03D60C56CFF; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:11:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.55])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A66AC178E7
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:10:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 130012194/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.180.37/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 88.104.180.37
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhYBAPCUdUlYaLQl/2dsb2JhbAAIzA+Fcw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,295,1231113600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="130012194"
Received: from 88-104-180-37.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.180.37])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2009 17:10:44 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <20090119232819.656FBC178E7@www2.open-std.org>
References: <20090119232819.656FBC178E7@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <D286166A-AD88-46E1-9CEB-585528043D73@bcs.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3858) Ballot 6 vote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:11:57 +0000
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 19 Jan 2009, at 23:31, Bill Long wrote:

> I disagree with the suggested change in the ballot from David
> Muxworthy. The term "C character kind" is defined at [392:3] in
> 15.1.1, so the reference to 15.1 seems reasonable. The same reference
> is used at, for example, [270:26].

Bill is correct and I withdraw my earlier comment.  However I
would prefer 15.1.1 to be used for the reference as it is already
used at [272:7] and [416:14].
David