From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Dec  9 05:45:40 2008
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 97C4CCA3439; Tue,  9 Dec 2008 05:45:40 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:45:39 CET
Received: from smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.184])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64D3CC178E5
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  9 Dec 2008 05:45:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 76441 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2008 04:38:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.32?) (van.snyder@76.208.177.192 with plain)
  by smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2008 04:38:57 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: kX.gau4VM1lPn9FjKFoMjQaANnuCxSsF60rr_Hkz3fJaohQadVmV9GKqwwtCZAamgzThrguYkgB0bgKgW2L2lH9KH3L6JECoAscexYhy2VevverbU.0076GEe5kLxU_Ubgo-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <493DF667.5070006@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:39:03 -0800
From: Van Snyder <van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3757) Ballot on the technical content of the
 TR
References: <20081127193527.EF00DC178D9@www2.open-std.org>	<20081208024650.76234C4596C@www2.open-std.org>	<20081208154207.B50ABC178E0@www2.open-std.org> <493DDCA3.3050104@sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <493DDCA3.3050104@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Robert Corbett wrote:
> I am not pleased that the proposal is making other vendors' 
> extensionsto the data structures, beyond what is needed for Fortran, 
> part of theFortran language.


Keep in mind that the Further Interoperability with C TR affects only 
interfaces with BIND(C).  Vendors can handle them differently from 
interfaces without BIND(C) if they choose to do so.

Van Snyder