From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Dec  4 12:01:24 2008
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E40D8CA5FE7; Thu,  4 Dec 2008 12:01:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 575 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:01:23 CET
Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.53])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE3BCA5FE4
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  4 Dec 2008 12:01:23 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 114965413/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.69.75.159/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 79.69.75.159
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhLTACJFN0lPRUuf/2dsb2JhbACCLwSNL8BugwI
Subject: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: (SC22WG5.3726) May WG5/J3 meeting]]
X-IP-Spam-Verdict: SUSPECTEDSPAM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,714,1220223600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="114965413"
Received: from 79-69-75-159.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [79.69.75.159]) ([79.69.75.159])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2008 10:51:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4937B641.8060809@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:51:45 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


> On Dec 3, 2008, at 8:34 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
> 
> 
>>Makki has indicated a preference for 3-8 May instead of 10-15 May for
>>the 2009 WG5/J3 meeting.
>>
>>I have contracts for 10-15 May.
>>
>>If we are to move the meeting forward one week, we should do it soon.
>>Valerie says the sleeping rooms and meeting space are available as of
>>now, but that could change soon.
>>
>>Let me know by Monday of next week if you want to change the date.

I can manage the first week of May and would like to accommodate Makki.

It has been pointed out to me that neither the J3 or the WG5 site specifies the
exact date, nor do the draft minutes. I think we decided to switch to Monday to
Friday meetings, which I will add to the minutes.

In view of the way we worked to the dot of 12 noon on Friday in Tokyo, should we
do the same in Las Vegas?

Cheers,

John.