From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Wed Dec 3 09:18:31 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom7 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom7@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 6B25ECA342F; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:18:31 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B433ECA3428 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:18:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from 218-42-159-108.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp ([218.42.159.108] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ns.nag-j.co.jp with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L7mvr-0001yd-05 for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:18:03 +0900 Message-ID: <4936410A.4040209@nag-j.co.jp> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:19:22 +0900 From: Malcolm Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Windows/2008022014) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3701) Atomic stuff References: <20081203025222.12F4BC178E0@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20081203025222.12F4BC178E0@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Van Snyder wrote: > I wasn't entirely satisfied with the way we provided for atomic memory > operations in Tokyo, but I wanted to think about it some more before > bringing it up. > > I can think of three ways that I would prefer to the intrinsic > subroutines described in 08-297r1. > At first glance, 08-297r1 is an improvement (imo) over these suggestions. > Actually, I would prefer a much higher level concept, As would several of the UK delegation, but these were kept adamantly off the table. Cheers, -- ................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.