From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Feb 28 04:52:19 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom6 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom6@open-std.org Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id D484DD8934; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:52:19 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nmta2.jpl.nasa.gov (nmta.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.215]) by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA8438508 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:51:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.144]) by nmta2.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m1S3pYJS006632 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:51:34 -0800 Received: from mprox3.jpl.nasa.gov (mprox3.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.171]) by xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m1S3pWUD005532 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:51:32 -0800 Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by mprox3.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m1S3pVkg003487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:51:31 -0800 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3504) Letter ballot on Fortran 2003 interpretations From: Van Snyder Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov To: sc22wg5 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Yes Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:51:31 -0800 Message-Id: <1204170691.9187.11.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-40.el5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57] X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Jim is correct. This wouldn't affect the corrigendum, but we might as well get it right. Van ====================================================================== On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:53 -0500, Jim Xia wrote: > > > The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > -Y- --- F03/0049 Separators in list-directed output > involving UDDTIO > -Y- --- F03/0050 Questions about internal files > -Y- --- F03/0086 Elemental and BIND(C) > -Y- --- F03/0088 Defined operations/assignments and > VOLATILE/ASYNCHRONOUS > -Y- --- F03/0089 Interoperability of non-BIND derived types > -C- --- F03/0092 Procedure characteristics and unlimited > polymorphic > -Y- --- F03/0093 Allocatable array on intrinsic assignment with > scalar expr > -Y- --- F03/0094 Final subroutine and VALUE attribute > -Y- --- F03/0095 Bounds remapped pointer assignment and > ASSOCIATED > -Y- --- F03/0097 Blanks as separators in NAMELIST input > -Y- --- F03/0098 Does allocate with source= define subcomponents? > -Y- --- F03/0101 Is UDDTIO output suitable for namelist and > list-directed input > > > Comments on F03/0092 > > In the example code, it uses the following declaration > procedure (foo), target :: proc_tgt > > Don't we just violate the syntax rules for in > procedure > declaration statement [264:9-20]? TARGET is not listed as one of the > [264:13-18]. This statement should be changed to > procedure (foo) :: proc_tgt > as appeared in the original interp paper. > > > > Jim Xia > > XL Fortran Compiler Testing > IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave. > Phone (905) 413-3444 Tie-line 313-3444 > D2/NAH/8200 /MKM > _______________________________________________ > J3 mailing list > J3@j3-fortran.org > http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3