From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Feb 19 16:43:42 2008
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom6
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom6@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 76748D942F; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:43:42 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from gloin.rl.ac.uk (gloin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.201])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1B823A4A
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:43:26 +0100 (CET)
X-RAL-MFrom: <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by gloin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1JFhHdI022180
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:43:17 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m1JFhHAF004520;
	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:43:17 GMT
Message-ID: <47BAF915.9060302@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:43:17 +0000
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060209 Fedora/1.7.12-1.1.2.legacy
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: WG5 ballot on N1718
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -1.44 : ALL_TRUSTED
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 130.246.135.201
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

WG5,

Congratulations, Malcolm, on getting the revised draft ready ahead of time. It 
is now visible on the WG5 site.

In accord with our decision in Las Vegas, see I am now starting a WG5 ballot.
The aim is simply to find anything that does not accord with our decisions in 
Las Vegas. The ballot ends on March 6th. All votes must be received by me by
9 a.m. (UK time) on March 7th.

Please choose one of these alternatives below. All suggested corrections will be 
discussed by the Editor, me, and Dan. Those that we accept will be made before 
the document is sent to the SC22 Secretariat.

Best wishes,

John.

...........................


Vote on N1718

A. I have found nothing that is out of accord with our decisions in Las Vegas.

B. I think the following corrections should be made:

