From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Fri Sep 14 03:52:20 2007
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom6
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom6@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 9F270DCBAA; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:52:20 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 3625 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at pingo.cv.ihk.dk; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:52:19 UTC
Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C45AD7C64
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:52:04 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from dan-nagles-power-mac-g5.local ([71.163.234.92])
 by vms042.mailsrvcs.net
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr  3 2006))
 with ESMTPA id <0JOC00DGN2DBK739@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for
 sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:51:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:51:10 -0400
From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@verizon.net>
Subject: what now, 754r?
To: J3 List <j3@j3-fortran.org>, WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Reply-to: dnagle@erols.com
Message-id: <46E9DAFE.90603@verizon.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

Both J3 and WG5 should now be pondering what to do
in the face of various scenarios regarding
either the substantial delay
or eventual withdrawal of 754r.

Do we want to try to keep what we've got,
or remove it and hope for a more stable target
at some point in the future?

I'm asking now so as to allow time for considered views
to be expressed before the meetings when action will be required.

-- 

Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.