From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Jun 29 20:39:32 2006
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dmo5
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dmo5@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id C3DEE216CF; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:39:32 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94CB216CF
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:39:30 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5TIdS3l004205
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:39:28 -0400
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k5TIdS8v200708
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:39:28 -0400
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5TIdS8d012652
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:39:28 -0400
Received: from d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.104])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5TIdSmN012638
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:39:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060623195250.98322249B5@open-std.org>
Subject: WG5 Vote on Corrigendum 2
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF144 February 01, 2006
Message-ID: <OF6615EAF2.60408EFD-ON8525719C.00655EDC-8525719C.00667981@ca.ibm.com>
From: Rob James <rbjames@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:39:17 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 06/29/2006
 14:39:29
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Vote on N1660 (anyone may vote):

No, for the following reasons:

In subclause 4.4.4.1, while I do agree that "or <derived-type-spec>" needs
to be in the edit for [41:9+], I believe that the "or <derived-type-spec>"
at [41:33+] is incorrect.  This list is about the meaning of an asterisk
for a <char-length>, which can't appear in a <derived-type-spec>.  If the
text "or <derived-type-spec>" is removed from the edit for [41:33+], I'll
change my vote to a yes.

Rob James
XL Fortran Compiler Developer
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-6043
E-mail: rbjames@ca.ibm.com