From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Jun  8 02:57:14 2006
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dmo5
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dmo5@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 7A920216E2; Thu,  8 Jun 2006 02:57:14 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05061B5A7
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  8 Jun 2006 02:57:12 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (nwkea-mail-1.sun.com [192.18.42.13])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id k580uKd1060165
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 02:56:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from michaeli@ranma.sfbay.sun.com)
Received: from sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.145.154.35])
	by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k57NpISP019931;
	Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ranma.sfbay.sun.com (ranma.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.84.89])
	by sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id k57NpI6t018945;
	Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from michaeli@localhost)
	by ranma.sfbay.sun.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id k57NpGk03222;
	Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Ingrassia <michaeli@ranma.sfbay.sun.com>
Message-Id: <200606072351.k57NpGk03222@ranma.sfbay.sun.com>
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk, j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: (j3.2005) (SC22WG5.3384) WG5 Vote on Corrigendum 2
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

I think I'll have to vote No on this.


As regards the change suggested in N1658 for 4.4.4.1, this new change makes
reference to the "derived-type-spec of a type guard statement (8.1.5)".

I pulled up my copy of 04-007 and I don't see derived-type-spec in the
type guard statement.  What I see at [178:16-18] is

R823 type-guard-stmt is TYPE IS (type-spec ) [ select-construct-name ]
		     or CLASS IS ( type-spec ) [ select-construct-name ]
		     or CLASS DEFAULT [ select-construct-name ]

What should the reader of Corrigendum 2 take as the reference? 

	--Michael I.