From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Wed Feb 22 19:57:25 2006
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo2
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo2@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E232E1B57B; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEDA152CA
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.23])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id k1MJuhZb023617
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:56:45 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
Received: from 88-105-187-177.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com) ([88.105.187.177])
  by mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2006 19:52:20 +0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aa4HAMFN/EOICSw
Received: from 88-105-187-177.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.105.187.177]:1676 helo=[127.0.0.1])
	by mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1FC027-000OE2-T6; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:52:19 +0000
Message-ID: <43FCC0F2.5040901@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:52:18 +0000
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Corrigendum 1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

WG5,

The good news: corrigendum 1 has been published and I was able to access it 
without charge from

<http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43930>

But the bad news is that they have altered it without consulting us. So much for 
passing resolutions at SC22 plenary!

The problem is very sloppy changing of italic font to Roman or vice-versa.

I have protested to the SC22 secretariat and asked for it to be republished.

Best wishes,

John.

