From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Thu Feb 17 11:34:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 5FC1914975; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:34:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE13B70A1
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:34:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j1HAV2wE016929
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:31:04 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
X-RAL-MFrom: <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1HAXYW3031290;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:33:34 GMT
Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1HAbwIc010048;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:37:58 GMT
Message-ID: <42147406.4010908@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:37:58 +0000
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20041005
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: Internationalization
References: <420B34E8.3060301@rl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <420B34E8.3060301@rl.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

WG5,

Miles commented on the draft policy on Internationalization that I sent out a 
week ago. He was very supportive but wanted a small change in the wording. I 
discussed his suggestion with Makki and Malcolm, but we all felt that the 
original wording was good enough - see Makki's posting of Feb 11. There were no 
other comments. Our policy will therefore be as in the draft and the paper 
(N1619) will be on the server soon.

Best wishes,

John.