From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Fri Jan 14 20:17:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 59E391F2E8; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:17:54 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66]) by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C05149A1 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:17:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from book.moene.indiv.nluug.nl (mail.moene.indiv.nluug.nl [195.109.255.217]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j0EJFDwE023282 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:15:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl) Received: from local ([127.0.0.1]) by book.moene.indiv.nluug.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CpX25-0002Rx-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:22:53 +0100 Message-ID: <41E81BF9.5010307@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:22:33 +0100 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Cc: WG5 Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.3185) WG5 letter ballot on interpretations References: <20041130151151.021653755B@ghz.klid.dk> In-Reply-To: <20041130151151.021653755B@ghz.klid.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John Reid wrote: > Dear WG5 members, > > J3 has been very active with interpretations and 39 are now ready for > WG5 ballot. > > The ballot is attached and will close on 14 January. Well, I tried to follow the discussion on this one (and reread it this evening). > The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted: So I understand some of these interps are against Fortran 95, even the ones that are not marked as such ... However, the remaining issues (see replies by Malcolm Cohen and Rob James) are complicated enough that I'm not sure my vote would add any insight. So I'll officially pass. If that means - according to the rules - that I didn't vote on this ballot, so be it. Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/