From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Jan  4 16:47:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id DC222149E3; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 16:47:50 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FB212B08
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 16:47:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j04FhFwE042580
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:44:39 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from rich_maine@mail.dfrc.nasa.gov)
Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:44:30 -0800
Received: from [130.134.31.78] (viruswall.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.64.54])
          by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov
          for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:45:32 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <20050104105501.883A812B08@open-std.org>
References: <20050104105501.883A812B08@open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <A94BBF48-5E67-11D9-A31A-000D93AD336A@nasa.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Richard E Maine <Richard.Maine@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: (j3.2004) (SC22WG5.3196) [Fwd: WG5 letter ballot on interpretations]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:45:29 -0800
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:05 AM, John Reid wrote:
>  I think the DEFECT TYPE for items...
> should be 'Fortran 95 interpretation', since the references are to 
> Fortran 95....

Something along that line would be a good solution. I don't object to 
doing f95
interps; I agree there is still value in them.  I just think it needs 
to be
clear without having to reverse engineer each interp by seeing what 
standard
it would make sense for.

-- 
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                             |        -- Mark Twain

