From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Tue Jan 4 11:46:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 8268611F16; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:46:45 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-smarthost-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.40]) by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF074572A for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:46:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from ppp-225-13-214.friaco.access.uk.tiscali.com ([80.225.13.214]:49294) by mk-smarthost-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1ClmCl-000BAN-NU for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:46:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20050103183954.8EE8112E3C@open-std.org> References: <20050103183954.8EE8112E3C@open-std.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0700C19C-5E3E-11D9-AC52-000393AB9EC0@tiscali.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: David Muxworthy From: David Muxworthy Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.3194) WG5 letter ballot on interpretations Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:47:28 +0000 To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Richard E Maine wrote: > It seems to mostly come down to the question of what standard we > are interpreting... > As best as I can tell, the interps are a mix of f95 and f2003 ones, > with no explicit distinction. To clarify my vote: I had assumed that in N1612, items 000004 to 000104 and JP-24 were F95 interpretations. Of these 16, ten result in no edits, one already includes suggested edits to F03, two could (should?) have corresponding edits applied to F03, two have had their edits already incorporated in F03 and one (000030) relates to text presented differently in F03. Of the nine F90 interpretations, only one results in an edit and this could be applied to F03 if the interpretation is approved. David