From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Mon Sep 20 20:56:17 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo@ghz.klid.dk Received: by ghz.klid.dk (Postfix, from userid 521) id 88AD637607; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:56:17 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66]) by ghz.klid.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20B737605 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:56:15 +0200 (CET DST) Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i8KIqgjH014922 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:54:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rich_maine@mail.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:46:57 -0700 Received: from [130.134.31.78] (viruswall.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.64.54]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:54:10 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <200409201843.i8KIhrYM003180@math.jpl.nasa.gov> References: <200409201843.i8KIhrYM003180@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <73208364-0B36-11D9-B76F-000D93AD336A@nasa.gov> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Richard E Maine Subject: Re: (j3.2004) Last minute sanity check on Modules TR Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:54:07 -0700 To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Sep 20, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: > I have just realized, however, that we have introduced a situation > wherein the lexical analysis of a statement depends upon its context, > at least in fixed form. Slightly annoying, but it isn't as though it is the only case of that in the language. Statement functions can look like assignment statements, even in free source form. True, statement functions are obsolescent, but then so is fixed source form. > Does this concern > anybody enough to want to reconsider it? I could be wrong, but I didn't think we had that opportunity. I wouldn't vote to reconsider for that reason anyway, but I think it is moot. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; Richard.Maine@nasa.gov | experience comes from bad judgment. | -- Mark Twain