From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Mon Sep 13 16:51:08 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo@ghz.klid.dk Received: by ghz.klid.dk (Postfix, from userid 521) id 0351837646; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:51:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66]) by ghz.klid.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFBE37638 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i8DElujH039696 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:49:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rich_maine@mail.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:42:06 -0700 Received: from [130.134.31.78] (viruswall.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.64.54]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:49:15 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20040913140309.7871337646@ghz.klid.dk> References: <200409091804.i89I4Q2E029101@math.jpl.nasa.gov> <20040910154605.23C2D37646@ghz.klid.dk> <20040913111608.101D937643@ghz.klid.dk> <20040913140309.7871337646@ghz.klid.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1376BDF5-0594-11D9-AEBD-000D93AD336A@nasa.gov> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Richard E Maine Subject: Re: (j3.2004) (SC22WG5.3162) Resolutions from SC22 plenary meeting Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:49:12 -0700 To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Sep 13, 2004, at 7:03 AM, John Reid wrote: > For Fortran, Roger simply used an old glossary, and I think all we > need do now is send him the Latex of the F2003 glossary so that he has > the definitions. He does not want us to do a huge amount of work, for > example, extracting all the bold definitions in the text. Unless > anyone has any objections, I will send him the Latex or its web > address. Ok. No objection per se. As you say, that is at least easy for us. I was a little concerned about things like asking for all the bolded definitions or even more. I personally don't find our glossary very useful, both because of the somewhat random collection of things in it and because many of the definitions don't stand well alone. (At least I think that we got rid of most of the cases where the glossary definitions were flat wrong). But I'm aware that some people (including John, if I recall correctly) feel differently and do find the glossary useful. Anyway, though I'm dubious about how much good it will do to send them the glossary, I can't see any harm in it either, so I don't object. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; Richard.Maine@nasa.gov | experience comes from bad judgment. | -- Mark Twain