From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Mon Jul 12 19:33:43 2004 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) id i6CHXh1l079490 for sc22wg5-domo; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:33:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i6CHXU1K079479 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:33:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6CHZMrF001968; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:35:23 +0100 Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6CHZOVA021477; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:35:24 +0100 Message-ID: <40F2CBDC.6040304@rl.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:35:24 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sally Seitz CC: WG5 Subject: Re: ISO 1539 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Sally Seitz wrote: > Dear Keith and Ali, > > As you can see below, the ballot for this document was to be initiated on 8 > July 2004. I received the "STADIST" newsletter today and saw no indication > that the ballot had been initiated. I also checked the JTC 1/SC 22 site on > Live Link, and there is no document there associated with this project > either. > > As this document was submitted to ITTF in May, I wonder why the ballot has > not been initiated and when we can expect it to begin? ISO has made it very > clear to committee secretaries that time is of the essence in standards > development (e.g. reducing the timeframe for standards development), and SC > 22 has been working diligently to prepare documents in a timely manner and > this delay in ballot initiation is a disappointment. > > Thank you and best regards, > Sally > Well said! Thanks for your support. John.