From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Mon May 17 18:24:01 2004 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) id i4HGO1lb005465 for sc22wg5-domo; Mon, 17 May 2004 18:24:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i4HGNpE7005457 for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 18:23:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4HGP7rF004579; Mon, 17 May 2004 17:25:07 +0100 Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4HGOxVA026477; Mon, 17 May 2004 17:24:59 +0100 Message-ID: <40A8E75B.3080908@rl.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:24:59 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (j3.2004) (SC22WG5.3122) Incorporating Modules TR into the next standard References: <200405140230.i4E2UsrL099385@dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: > Assuming that N1601 and N1602 both pass their ballots, is it safe to assume > that the first edits we will do to create the next standard will be to > incorporate the Extended Modules TR 19767 into the standard? > > If so, I shall prepare a revision of N1602 that has page and line number > references for 04-007 in the margin, as a J3 paper, for voting at meeting > 169 or 170 or so. My vote is against doing this. If the text has been written properly, it should already be unambiguous. Adding line numbers is work for you, is work for us to check, and may introduce ambiguities. Cheers, John.