From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Thu Apr  1 16:19:24 2004
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) id i31EJOuJ007504
	for sc22wg5-domo; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:19:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i31EJHE7007495
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:19:19 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
X-RAL-MFrom: <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i31EJpYW013482;
	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:19:51 +0100
Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i31ELS2Q012886;
	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:21:28 +0100
Message-ID: <406C2568.2060001@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:21:28 +0100
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Ballot result
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------030409090009020100080304"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030409090009020100080304
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

WG5,

I am pleased to say that the TR has passed its ballot. Congratulations, Van.

Details of the vote are in the attached document, which will be on the
server soon.

Incidently, Resolution 12B of JTC 1's November 2003 meeting in Singapore
says:

"JTC 1 resolves that all ballots (at all levels) must have at least 50% of
P members responding (which includes abstentions) in order for the ballot
to be valid."

SC22 is alarmed by this and is doing its best to resist. It is also trying
to get P members to be more active or withdraw, but had little success with
this in the past.

If this rule had been applied to us, both our ballots would have failed.

Cheers,

John.

--------------030409090009020100080304
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="N1587.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="N1587.txt"

                                              ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1587 

                         Result of the PDTR ballot               

                                  John Reid
 

An PDTR Registration and Approval ballot for the technical report on 
Enhanced Module Facilities was held between 23 December 2003 and 
23 March 2004, see ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N3693. The results are in 
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N3727, and are reproduced here. 

................................

The following responses were received on the subject of registration:

"P" Members supporting registration without comments 
8 (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, 
Russia Federation, United Kingdom)

P" Members supporting registration with comments            
1 (US)

"P" Members not supporting registration
0

"P" Members abstaining                  
2 (Austria, Switzerland)

"P" Members not voting                  
13 (Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Finland, France, Ireland, 
DPR of Korea, Netherlands, Romania, Slovenia, Ukraine)

The TR was registered. 

................................

The following responses were received on the subject of approval:

"P" Members supporting approval without comments
7 (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, 
Russia Federation)

P" Members supporting approval with comments            
2 (UK, US)

"P" Members not supporting approval
0

"P" Members abstaining                  
2 (Austria, Switzerland)

"P" Members not voting                   
13 (Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Finland, France, Ireland, 
DPR of Korea, Netherlands, Romania, Slovenia, Ukraine)

 

United Kingdom

If the UK edits for page 403 of the FCD for Fortran 2003 are accepted,
the following edit should be made to the PDTR:

[8:19-20]. Add to the end of C1237a 'or it has a NAME= specifier and 
the value of its expression is all blanks or of zero length' and delete
the note to WG5.
Rationale: See the note to WG5 on [8:19-20].

 

United States

Comments from US National Body concerning PDTR 19767:

Page and line numbers refer to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5/N1581.


[2:39] To remove the possibility of a perverse reading, insert 
"in" before "one".

[6:2+] "In the first, third and fifth lines of the first paragraph of 
subclause 2.3.3, insert ', <end-sep-subprogram-stmt>' after 
'<end-subroutine-stmt>' three times."

[6:7, 6:9, 6:10, 6:13, 6:14] Replace "and" with ", and within". 

[6:19] Replace "or" with ", or within".

[7:2-3] Replace "C1109" by "C1110" twice.

[8:17-20 (8:18-21 in 04-260)] Delete constraint C1237a, the description 
of where it was proposed to insert it into the FCD, and the note to WG5.

[10:20+] "In the fifth line of the first paragraph of subclause 16.4.1.3, 
insert ', module procedure interfaces' after 'abstract interfaces'."

The results of this ballot were forwarded to SC 22/WG 5 for review, 
production of a disposition of comments report, and preparation of 
the DTR text.

 

 

--------------030409090009020100080304--

