1. Introduction
C++11 added atomic_flag
to the language as the minimally-required class which
could be used to implement atomic<>
on hardware which seemed relevant at the
time. Detailed atomic_flag
history can be found in [N2145], [N2324], and [N2393]. The specification was quite successful at minimalism—the only member
functions of atomic_flag
are test_and_set
and clear
—but atomic<>
was
wildly more successful and to our knowledge has always been implemented with
compiler support instead of with the very inefficient (but beautifully simple) atomic_flag
. Our experience is that atomic_flag
's interface is so minimal as
to be mostly useless, in particular it doesn’t have a method which can load the
flag’s value without modifying it.
We’ve heard of it being used as:
-
A questionable spinloop (as was originally intended);
-
A "check-in" flag used to know when at least one thread has reached a program location.
The one special power atomic_flag
has is in being the only type which is
guaranteed to be lock-free, albeit a mostly powerless one.
SG1 tried to salvage atomic_flag
in [P0514R0] by adding set
, test
, wait
, wait_until
, and wait_for
methods but decided to leave it as-is and
implement efficient waiting differently, eventually going for [P0514R3].
The time has come to thank atomic_flag
for serving its purpose as an
implementability stand-in, and help it find its true purpose. We propose:
-
Adding a
test
method to it as [P0514R0] did. This could technically forbids some ancestral processors from implementing modern C++, but these platforms already don’t support any C++. -
Add
atomic_flag
overloads to [P0514R3]'s waiting and notify functions. -
Add optional always-lock-free integral type aliases, which are encouraged to be sized such that waiting on them is most efficient.
This paper was written in Jacksonville and presented to SG1, which unanimously forwarded the paper to LEWG. LEWG looked at the paper and took the following poll:
SF | F | N | A | SA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Make the type aliases non-optional. | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
The types were made optional in case an architecture, such as PA-RISC, cannot support always-lock-free integral types because no compare-and-exchange instruction is available. There was no consensus for making aliases required, though concern was expressed that LEWG doesn’t usually make functionality optional. In the C++ standard library optionality is present as follows:
-
intN_t
/uintN_t
are mandated by C, "if an implementation provides integer types with widths of 8, 16, 32, or 64 bits, no padding bits, and (for the signed types) that have a two’s complement representation"; -
abs
anddiv
overloads "if and only if the typeintmax_t
designates an extended integer type"; -
The library
allocator_traits
template has optional requirements.
There was also discussion about ABI breakage to atomic_flag
. An argument was
made that atomic_flag
should also be sized such that waiting on them is most
efficient (which would be an ABI breakage), and if that breakage doesn’t occur
then adding wait / notify overloads is actively misleading. LEWG want SG1 to
reconsider whether the overloads should be provided.
2. Wording
Under Header <atomic>
synopsis [atomics.syn] edit as follows:
// 32.3, type aliases // ...using atomic_signed_lock_free = see below; // optional using atomic_unsigned_lock_free = see below; // optional// 32.8, flag type and operations struct atomic_flag;bool atomic_flag_test(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test(atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept;bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear(atomic_flag*) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; #define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT see below// 32.10, waiting and notifying functions template <class T> void atomic_notify_one(const volatile atomic<T>*); template <class T> void atomic_notify_one(const atomic<T>*);void atomic_notify_one(const volatile atomic_flag*); void atomic_notify_one(const atomic_flag*);template <class T> void atomic_notify_all(const volatile atomic<T>*); template <class T> void atomic_notify_all(const atomic<T>*);void atomic_notify_all(const volatile atomic_flag*); void atomic_notify_all(const atomic_flag*);template <class T> void atomic_wait(const volatile atomic<T>*, typename atomic<T>::value_type); template <class T> void atomic_wait(const atomic<T>*, typename atomic<T>::value_type);void atomic_wait(const volatile atomic_flag*, bool); void atomic_wait(const atomic_flag*, bool);template <class T> void atomic_wait_explicit(const volatile atomic<T>*, typename atomic<T>::value_type, memory_order); template <class T> void atomic_wait_explicit(const atomic<T>*, typename atomic<T>::value_type, memory_order);void atomic_wait_explicit(const volatile atomic_flag*, bool, memory_order); void atomic_wait_explicit(const atomic_flag*, bool, memory_order);
In Atomic operations library [atomics], under Type aliases [atomics.alias], edit as follows:
The type aliases
atomic_intN_t
,atomic_uintN_t
,atomic_intptr_t
, andatomic_uintptr_t
are defined if and only ifintN_t
,uintN_t
,intptr_t
, anduintptr_t
are defined, respectively.The type aliases
atomic_signed_lock_free
andatomic_unsigned_lock_free
are defined to be specializations ofatomic
whose template arguments are integral types, respectively signed and unsigned, other thanbool
.is_always_lock_free
shall betrue
foratomic_signed_lock_free
andatomic_unsigned_lock_free
. These aliases are optional. If an implementation provides a integral specialization ofatomic
other thanbool
for whichis_always_lock_free
istrue
, it shall define the aliases to such a type. Otherwise, they shall not be defined. An implementation should choose the integral specialization ofatomic
for which the waiting and notifying functions are most efficient.
In Atomic operations library [atomics], under Flag type and operations [atomics.flag], edit as follows:
namespace std { struct atomic_flag {bool test(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; bool test(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept;bool test_and_set(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; bool test_and_set(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept; void clear(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; void clear(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept; atomic_flag() noexcept = default; atomic_flag(const atomic_flag&) = delete; atomic_flag& operator=(const atomic_flag&) = delete; atomic_flag& operator=(const atomic_flag&) volatile = delete; };bool atomic_flag_test(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test(atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept;bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(atomic_flag*) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear(volatile atomic_flag*) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear(atomic_flag*) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(volatile atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(atomic_flag*, memory_order) noexcept; #define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT see below }The
atomic_flag
type provides the classic test-and-set functionality. It has two states, set and clear.Operations on an object of type
atomic_flag
shall be lock-free. [ Note: Hence the operations should also be address-free. —end note]The
atomic_flag
type is a standard-layout struct. It has a trivial default constructor and a trivial destructor.The macro
ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT
shall be defined in such a way that it can be used to initialize an object of typeatomic_flag
to the clear state. The macro can be used in the form:atomic_flag guard = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;It is unspecified whether the macro can be used in other initialization contexts. For a complete static-duration object, that initialization shall be static. Unless initialized with
ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT
, it is unspecified whether anatomic_flag
object has an initial state of set or clear.bool atomic_flag_test(volatile atomic_flag* object) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test(atomic_flag* object) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(volatile atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_explicit(atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag::test(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; bool atomic_flag::test(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept;Requires: The
order
argument shall not bememory_order_release
normemory_order_acq_rel
.Effects: Memory is affected according to the value of
order
.Returns: Atomically returns the value pointed to by
object
orthis
.bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(volatile atomic_flag* object) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set(atomic_flag* object) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(volatile atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; bool atomic_flag::test_and_set(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; bool atomic_flag::test_and_set(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept;Effects: Atomically sets the value pointed to by
object
or bythis
totrue
. Memory is affected according to the value oforder
. These operations are atomic read-modify-write operations (4.7).Returns: Atomically, the value of the object immediately before the effects.
void atomic_flag_clear(volatile atomic_flag* object) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear(atomic_flag* object) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(volatile atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; void atomic_flag_clear_explicit(atomic_flag* object, memory_order order) noexcept; void atomic_flag::clear(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept; void atomic_flag::clear(memory_order order = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept;Requires: The
order
argument shall not bememory_order_consume
,memory_order_acquire
, normemory_order_acq_rel
.Effects: Atomically sets the value pointed to by
object
or bythis
tofalse
. Memory is affected according to the value oforder
.
In Atomic operations library [atomics], under Waiting and notifying functions [atomics.wait], edit as follows:
The functions in this subclause provide a mechanism to wait for the value of an atomic object to change, more efficiently than can be achieved with polling. Waiting functions in this facility may block until they are unblocked by notifying functions, according to each function’s effects. [Note: Programs are not guaranteed to observe transient atomic values, an issue known as the A-B-A problem, resulting in continued blocking if a condition is only temporarily met. – End Note.]
The functions
atomic_wait
andatomic_wait_explicit
are waiting functions. The functionsatomic_notify_one
andatomic_notify_all
are notifying functions.template <class T> void atomic_notify_one(const volatile atomic<T>* object); template <class T> void atomic_notify_one(const atomic<T>* object);void atomic_notify_one(const volatile atomic_flag* object); void atomic_notify_one(const atomic_flag* object);Effects: unblocks up to execution of a waiting function that blocked after observing the result of an atomic operation X, if there exists another atomic operation Y, such that X precedes Y in the modification order of
*object
, and Y happens-before this call.template <class T> void atomic_notify_all(const volatile atomic<T>* object); template <class T> void atomic_notify_all(const atomic<T>* object);void atomic_notify_all(const volatile atomic_flag* object); void atomic_notify_all(const atomic_flag* object);Effects: unblocks each execution of a waiting function that blocked after observing the result of an atomic operation X, if there exists another atomic operation Y, such that X precedes Y in the modification order of
*object
, and Y happens-before this call.template <class T> void atomic_wait_explicit(const volatile atomic<T>* object, typename atomic<T>::value_type old, memory_order order); template <class T> void atomic_wait_explicit(const atomic<T>* object, typename atomic<T>::value_type old, memory_order order);Requires: The order argument shall not be
memory_order_release
normemory_order_acq_rel
.Effects: Repeatedly performs the following steps, in order:
Evaluates
object->load(order) != old
then, if the result istrue
, returns.Blocks until an implementation-defined condition has been met. [Note: Consequently, it may unblock for reasons other than a call to a notifying function. - end note]
void atomic_wait_explicit(const volatile atomic_flag* object, bool old, memory_order order); void atomic_wait_explicit(const atomic_flag* object, bool old, memory_order order);Effects: Repeatedly performs the following steps, in order:
Evaluates
object->test(order) != old
then, if the result istrue
, returns.Blocks until an implementation-defined condition has been met. [Note: Consequently, it may unblock for reasons other than a call to a notifying function. - end note]
template <class T> void atomic_wait(const volatile atomic<T>* object, typename atomic<T>::value_type old); template <class T> void atomic_wait(const atomic<T>* object, typename atomic<T>::value_type old);void atomic_wait(const volatile atomic_flag* object, bool old); void atomic_wait(const atomic_flag* object, bool old);Effects: Equivalent to:
atomic_wait_explicit(object, old, memory_order_seq_cst);
Two feature test macros should be added:
-
__cpp_lib_atomic_flag_test
implies thetest
methods foratomic_flag
and free functions, as well as the notify and wait overloads foratomic_flag
, are available. -
__cpp_lib_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases
impliesatomic_signed_lock_free
andatomic_unsigned_lock_free
types are defined.